Street Photography should be for everyone, and it should not be reserved only for extroverts who are really good at making small talk with their subjects. Is this a useful trait to have as a street photographer? Of course it is, but let's face it not everyone is this way.
As an ambivert I have a personality that really enjoys getting out of the house as much as possible. Going on small adventures during the week either by myself or with close friends is what keeps me going. I do have some introverted tendencies as well namely social anxiety around random people and also a minor case of agoraphobia- which is fear of large crowds.
It is random how well I will do with an encounter with a random stranger off the street. Sometimes I will handle it just fine, other times I will freeze up not have a good answer and the flight instinct will take over. I can sometimes field the standard questions all street photographers get namely "what are you taking photos of" with short and concise answers but am rarely able to turn it around into a longer small talk conversation (it's happened a few times but it is rare).
Having a zoom lens gives me the option of being able to change my distance away from my subject if it is a person with how I read said individual. How observant are they and how likely am I to get noticed? If I am noticed will they confront me? I could (and possibly will) in the future write up an entire article about social interaction and street photography, but these are questions that are constantly in my mind as I am out and about on the street doing photography while trying to be aware of my surroundings.
Additionally, in many cases I will find a situation where someone is doing something which tells a story and approaching them, even if they were a subject who was open to getting a street photo ruins that moment.
You may go from a great candid photo of someone reading a book in a park or feeding their dog part of a sandwich while watching the ducks in the pond to getting emotionless posed photos that look like they came out of a senior photoshoot at best or a mug shot for a church directory at worst. Personally, with a few exceptions I don't care for either look and would much rather have the candid.
I could make this section longer, as I really believe that having to be stuck at one focal length is absolute rubbish.
I've done street photography with everything from a 3.2 megapixel point and shoot camera from 2001 up to a modern mirrorless camera with all the bells and whistles and a super zoom lens. They all have their place.
One last thing to note: using a longer focal length you'll get a more natural looking proportion to your subject rather then the "Big body, tiny head" effect of compression you may get with a wide angle prime like a 28mm or 35mm equivalent FOV. This is why a 70-200mm lens is a very popular lens for portrait work in a studio.
But the bigger elephant in the room and case for Telephoto in street is Candid photography. Its a lot easier to do with a Telephoto zoom focal length.
Prime Lenses get the best Image Quality and you need it to be good at Street Photography!
I may write this out later as a seperate post but to keep this nice and clean let's just clear the air here with a short bulleted summary of what I have to say about this:
- Zoom lenses are Valid. Limiting yourself to just using a #2 Philips screwdriver for every task because you are told its the "superior universal tool" is kinda silly.
- Not all zooms are the same with Image Quality. Those with constant max apertures (such as a Nikon 24-120 F4 or 70-200 2.8) will have much better image quality over a "kit" lens.
- Street Photography with certain exceptions (such as inside in a mall or done at blue hour and using street lights) almost always happens outdoors, and even on a cloudy day you are gathering more then enough light that you do not need a f1.2-2 aperture and in many cases physically can't unless you attach a neutral density filter. Outdoor lighting is where cheaper lenses such as kit lenses or superzooms really shine and the flaws in optical quality are really hard to pick out.
- Since a photo is worth a thousand words, here's some examples of Street photos I've taken with a zoom lens. I'll let you tell me how optically terrible and un-useable these photos really are:
- Not everyone is a track star: many people are well let's not sugar coat it: slower then others. This impacts how easy it is for zooming with your feet to be viable before the moment is gone. If you are a twenty one year old who works out every day and is 5'2" and weighs 110lbs then you are going to be a lot faster and able to get to where you want to stand to get your shot. But if you are like me, someone who is in their mid 40s, 6'5" tall and admitedly overweight and out of shape I tend to lumber forward so getting in position to get the shot I want quickly just isn't an option.
- There are many instances where Zooming with your feet is not an option.
- See something cool on the other side of a busy street and the nearest crosswalk is 200 feet away? Well, you could play frogger and hope to not get hit by a car, you could run up to the crosswalk and run back and hope to get your subject before they move or... you could just use a zoom lens and zoom in on your subject getting the shot without risking your life to do so.
- How about seeing something cool from a public sidewalk but what you want to photograph is on private property? Many urbex photographers would take this risk. However if you have a clear line of sight and the subject and angle is easily within your zoom from where you are standing why risk this if you don't have to?
- The moment will likely be gone before you get there. Using a zoom lens takes maybe a second to change the framing and get the shot. Even if you are in good shape, depending on how far away the subject is it could easily take ten to twenty seconds to zoom with your feet the same distance and by that time, the subject may have left or turned to a different angle or pose which is far less interesting.
It's the purisim of "I shoot with a Prime because it makes me a better Photographer!" that really gets to me. The whole "Get good, zoom with your feet, only take photos from your current vantage point" might work fine for some, but it doesn't work for everyone nor should you state that it does work for everyone.
To end this segment: Zoom lenses ARE valid. When I am out taking photos on the street I am not limiting myself to one subject, I could be taking street portraits, or I could be taking architecture photography, photos of urban wildlife (such as squirrels and pigeons), photos of cars, photos of signs, photos of window displays (one of my favorite things to shoot for street photography), and candids.
Using a zoom lens means I am ready at all times for any of these subjects as I see them: I don't have to miss a great photo of a squirrel digging a sandwich wrapper out of a trash can simply because I have too much pride to shoot anything other then a prime lens.
No comments:
Post a Comment